Theodore “Theo” Davidson
Columbia Business School
Age: 36
“Brooklyn born and raised. Built for public service. I make complex systems actually work.”
Hometown: Brooklyn, New York
Family Members: I was raised by a single mother whose resilience was its own form of genius. My older sister, twenty years my senior, was the first person to look at me and say, without flinching, that I could do anything. Those two women did not just shape my values. They built my foundation.
Fun fact about yourself: My siblings are a full 20 years older than me, which means I grew up as something of an only child with a built-in cheer squad of adults who treated every small win like a championship.
Undergraduate School and Degree: CUNY – City College of New York, Bachelor of Arts in Political Science
Where are you currently working? Accenture, Manager in Risk and Compliance
Extracurricular Activities, Community Work and Leadership Roles:
- Student Leadership and Ethics Board member (SLEB)
- REAP program instructor
- Tusk Philanthropies Fellow
- Teacher’s Assistant for Leadership & Org Change Course
- Social Rep Leader for Cluster B
- City Tutors Mentor
- Winner, Bernstein Center Change Management Competition
- Black Business Student Association Member
Which academic or extracurricular achievement are you most proud of during business school? Without a doubt, it has been my work with the ReEntry Acceleration Program (REAP).
REAP brings business education to incarcerated and recently-released individuals. I cannot share their specific stories because those belong to them. But I carry many of them, and they have stayed with me in ways I did not expect.
My classmates and I regularly visit a correctional facility to discuss business concepts with the ultimate goal of inspiring these justice-impacted individuals to start ventures of their own. As instructors, we are not just teaching theory, we are working to translate it into something practical and actionable for people whose circumstances demand that every idea actually holds up.
Watching the students ask sharp clarifying questions, engage with genuine curiosity, and wrestle with concepts until they land has been one of the most rewarding experiences of my time at Columbia. I truly cherish the time I have spent with them, and I look forward to seeing what they build.
What achievement are you most proud of in your professional career? Early in my career, I was an Anti-Money Laundering analyst at the New York State Attorney General’s office, where we partnered with the DOJ and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York on a mortgage fraud investigation. We were building a case against a lawyer and a pastor who had weaponized the trust of their victims to destroy their financial lives.
Under the guidance of seasoned prosecutors and incredibly supportive leaders, Meryl Lutsky and Ryan Poscablo, I learned what it means to do precise, consequential work. My analysis helped expand the documented fraud by millions of dollars and raised the victim count from one to six. Those victims were made whole. The mastermind defendant was ultimately deported.
That case gave me a principle I carry into every role: When systems fail, real people absorb the damage. When they work, people get their lives back.
More recently, as a program manager with Meta’s Legal organization, I built the infrastructure that allowed the team’s global impact to be measured and communicated across senior leadership. A completely different scale. The same instinct.
Who was your favorite MBA professor? Professor Robert Greenlee was my favorite professor, and his course on Economic and Political Disruption was one of the reasons I applied to Columbia in the first place.
I had read Bradley Tusk’s book, The Fixer, twice before I submitted my application and the course was primarily based on this text. The idea that a program existed where that material was taught not as theory but by people who had operated inside those systems was what drew me in. Greenlee delivered on that promise every single week.
What set him apart was what he carried into the room. He had been in the rooms where political and regulatory decisions get made, and that experience changed the texture of everything he said. When he talked about power moves – and how regulation functions as a tool rather than just a constraint and how the intersection of politics and business shapes markets — the room stopped feeling like a lecture. It felt like testimony. And he held all of it without cynicism and without naivety, which is a harder balance to strike than it sounds.
Coming from a compliance and regulatory background, I had spent years wondering whether the intersection of policy and business was a legitimate place to build a serious career or just a niche I had convinced myself mattered. Greenlee’s course answered that question. It did not just teach me how systems work. It taught me how to move them. For someone whose north star has always been institutional impact rather than institutional prestige, that was not an elective. It was a foundation.
His consistency across every session was what made it what it was. Not one great lecture — a professor who showed up the same way every week, prepared and direct, treating his students as people already operating at a high level. That standard raised mine.
Why did you choose this school’s executive MBA program? I chose Columbia because I had a gap I could no longer afford to ignore.
My entire career had been built in legal and compliance. I understood how rules worked, how institutions failed, and how to protect organizations from risk. What I did not understand was how to truly run a business. What does it mean to manage profit and loss? If entrepreneurship is a real goal – and for me it has always lived somewhere in the back of my mind – where do you even start? How do you fund a venture? How do you know whether an idea is viable before you bet your livelihood on it? I had questions I had never been able to answer because I had never been in rooms with people who actually knew.
That gap was becoming a ceiling. I could speak fluently about the guardrails. I had almost nothing to say about the engine.
Columbia put me in front of practitioners and experts who have built things, funded things, and failed at things — people who understand how to pull the right levers to start and scale great businesses.
Finance was the hardest, not because it was the most intellectually demanding, but because it was the most clarifying. For the first time, I had a framework for understanding how businesses create value, and what it would take to build something of my own.
The network compounded everything. My cohort included founders, investors, operators, public servants, and executives across industries I had never worked alongside. The clubs made it structural rather than accidental, creating entry points into conversations and communities that would have otherwise taken years to find. What I gained was not just a broader rolodex. It was a broader sense of what is possible for the kinds of problems I can work on and the rooms I can walk into.
That is what I came for. Columbia was the place that could deliver all of it, and proximity to Brooklyn and family sealed it. But the real reason was simpler: I needed to become someone I was not yet, and this was the program that could do that.
What is the biggest lesson you gained during your MBA and how did you apply it at work? I came in thinking I already knew how to prioritize. The program disabused me of that quickly.
Before Columbia, I was good at managing a full plate. What I had not learned was how to decide which plate to pick up in the first place. The EMBA did not teach me to work harder. It taught me that working harder on the wrong things is its own kind of failure.
The shift was slow and then sudden. Somewhere in the second semester, I stopped asking “Can I fit this in” and started asking “Does this belong in the 20 percent that actually moves the needle.” Those are not the same question and confusing them costs you more than time.
At Accenture, I carry that discipline into every engagement. The clients who struggle most are not the ones who lack resources, they are the ones trying to solve every problem at once. My job is often to help them see which problem, solved well, unlocks the rest. I learned to see that pattern at Columbia. I use it every day.
What I did not expect was the people. Somewhere along the way, without fully realizing it, I began building a personal board of directors, men and women from this cohort who I now turn to when navigating decisions that matter, professionally and personally. These are not just colleagues or classmates. They are people who have seen me think through hard problems in real time, and whose judgment I trust because I have watched them earn it. I am deeply grateful for each of them. Whatever comes next, I look forward to continuing this journey with them.
Give us a story during your time as an executive MBA on how you were able to juggle work, family and education? I am still learning how to manage it all. That is the honest answer, and I think it is worth saying plainly.
What I can tell you is what survival looked like. I lived and breathed by my calendar. Not in a motivational-poster way — in a this-is-the-only-thing-standing-between-me-and-chaos way. Sundays became sacred. That was the day I recovered, reset, and built a clear picture of the week ahead. What had to get done? What could be delegated? How could I tell someone that I could not contribute to right now because something else had to come first?
That last part was harder than it sounds. Saying no, or not yet, or I need to hand this off — those conversations do not get easier just because your schedule demands them. But I learned that protecting my priorities was not the same as letting people down. Most of the time. Not always.
The cost I carry is time with family. There is no way to dress that up. There were weekends I was not present the way I should have been. There were dinners where I was physically there but mentally somewhere else entirely. There were people I love who deserved more of me than I had to give during that stretch. I knew it while it was happening. That guilt did not go away just because the cause was legitimate.
The juggle is not something I solved. It is something I managed, imperfectly, week by week. What the program gave me — beyond the curriculum — was a clearer sense of what I am actually willing to sacrifice and what I am not. That is a harder lesson than any case study, and I am still sitting with it.
What was your biggest regret in business school? Not always being fully present, and knowing it while it was happening.
I showed up. Consistently, enthusiastically. But there were dinners where part of my mind was on a Monday deliverable. Conversations with professors I was only half-in because something at work would not let me go.
Reflection starts to feel like something you cannot afford in a program that moves this fast. I have come to believe it is the one thing you cannot skip. The moments that mattered most were often not the scheduled ones. They were the ones in between, if you were actually there for them.
I got a lot right. But I would slow down in those moments if I could do it again.
What is one way that your business school has integrated AI into your programming? What insights did you gain from using AI? Columbia is actively reworking its Core curriculum to put AI at the forefront, not as an elective but as a reality every leader must reckon with. One of the most tangible additions is Caseify, which replaces the static case study with something dynamic. Instead of arriving at fixed conclusions, you interrogate the material the way real decisions get made. It changed how I engage with a problem.
The deeper lesson is about judgment. The leaders who get the most from AI are not using it to replace their thinking. They are using it to pressure test ideas faster and surface blind spots earlier. The call still belongs to the human in the room. AI sharpens the path to it.
What was the main reason you chose an executive MBA program over part-time or online alternatives? I needed something that matched the intensity of my professional life, not something I could fit around the edges of it.
The EMBA holds you accountable in a way other formats just do not. Your cohort is in the room. Your professors know your name. The conversations happen in real time with people managing real stakes. That context changes everything.
I also missed being in a classroom. In Sandra Matz’s negotiation course, we had a guest who had interrogated Saddam Hussein as an FBI agent. Hearing him walk through those experiences and share his philosophy on negotiation: what leverage looks like and how trust gets built under the most extreme conditions imaginable, was unlike anything I had encountered in any professional setting. There were audible gasps in the room. I will not pretend I was not responsible for most of them. That kind of moment does not happen in an asynchronous format. You cannot manufacture it and you cannot schedule it. You just have to be in the room when it does.
How did you finance your EMBA and what did you do to make tuition and associated costs more affordable? It was through a combination of personal investment and federal loans. A deliberate bet on myself, made with clear eyes — and one I expect to validate many times over as I move into the next phase of my career.
What is your ultimate long-term professional goal? In my next career phase, I want to shape institutions, not just advise them.
In the near term, that means continuing to work at the intersection of technology, policy, and organizational systems — helping large institutions build their operations and earn the public trust that allows them to function at scale. I am particularly drawn to roles where strategy and operational design have to be solved simultaneously, because that is where I have had the most impact.
Longer term, I want to be inside the architecture of a major public institution — a city government, a regulatory agency, or a federal department — in a role where I help determine how it is built, how it decides, and how it earns trust from the people depending on it. I am not sure whether that means running for public office one day. What I am sure of is that public service is where this is heading.
DON’T MISS: BEST & BRIGHTEST EXECUTIVE MBAS: CLASS OF 2026
© Copyright 2026 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.
