The Biggest Losers In The Financial Times 2012 Executive MBA Ranking
| School | Decline | 2012 Rank | 2011 Rank |
| Ashridge | -32 | 94 | 62 |
| University College Dublin (Smurfit) | -31 | 88 | 57 |
| Tongji University/ENPC | -30 | 86 | 56 |
| Buffalo | -29 | 91 | 62 |
| Cranfield | -28 | 75 | 47 |
| FIA – Fundacao Instituto | -28 | 85 | 57 |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | -28 | 88 | 60 |
| Alberta/Calgary | -26 | 99 | 73 |
| Villanova | -22 | 73 | 51 |
| National Taiwan University | -21 | 66 | 45 |
| Pittsburgh (Katz) | -21 | 62 | 41 |
| Georgia (Terry) | -20 | 95 | 75 |
| Northwestern (Kellogg)/York | -16 | 27 | 11 |
| Copenhagen Business School | -16 | 92 | 76 |
| Vienna/Minnesota (Carlson) | -13 | 51 | 38 |
| Yonsei | -13 | 70 | 57 |
| Temple (Fox) | -11 | 63 | 52 |
| Vanderbilt (Owen) | -10 | 59 | 49 |
| Duke (Fuqua) | -10 | 16 | 6 |
Source: The Financial Times 2012 and 2011 EMBA rankings
(See following page for the biggest winners in the 2012 Financial Times Executive MBA ranking)
© Copyright 2026 Poets & Quants. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Poets & Quants, please submit your request HERE.
