The Best Standalone EMBA Programs Ranked By The Financial Times In 2013
School | 2013 Rank | 2012 Rank | Change |
1. Washington University (Olin) | 6 | 9 | +3 |
2. Pennsylvania (Wharton) | 7 | 8 | +1 |
3 Duke University (Fuqua) | 8 | 16 | +8 |
4. University of Chicago (Booth) | 9 | 10 | +1 |
5. CEIBS | 10 | 7 | -3 |
6. INSEAD | 11 | 6 | -5 |
7. IESE Business School | 12 | 14 | +2 |
8. Nanyang Business School | 13 | —– | —– |
9. CUHK Business School | 13 | 17 | +4 |
10. IE Business School | 15 | 12 | -3 |
11. National University of Singapore | 17 | 26 | +9 |
12. IMD | 19 | 20 | +1 |
13. London Business School | 20 | 15 | -5 |
14. Warwick Business School | 21 | 24 | +3 |
15. Korea University | 22 | 12 | -10 |
16. University of Oxford (Said) | 23 | 38 | +15 |
17. Northwestern (Kellogg) | 24 | 23 | -1 |
18. ESCP Europe | 25 | 21 | -4 |
19. Arizona State (Carey) | 28 | 21 | -7 |
20. ESMT | 29 | 40 | +11 |
21. Columbia Business School | 30 | 32 | +2 |
22. Georgetown (McDonough) | 31 | 35 | +4 |
23. Shanghai Jiao Tong (Antai) | 32 | —– | —– |
24. Imperial College | 33 | 31 | -2 |
25. New York (Stern) | 34 | 30 | -4 |
Source: The Financial Times 2013 Global Executive MBA Ranking
(See following page for the next 25 standalone EMBA programs)
Questions about this article? Email us or leave a comment below.